b: Did you see the Joe Strummer tribute?
m: Si - one of the ONLY musical stints that worked on the grammys, most were very weak. um, does bruce springsteen know what his face looks like while performing?
b: lol - It’s the face of a man in need of a laxative.
m: I was taken aback, kinda like a car wreck with that.
b: The performance was pretty awesome. I got a little choked up. They TOTALLY pulled it off. I could have done without the Soprano dude though. I always forget his name. He bugs the shit outta me. Dude is SO ugly. I don’t care how well he plays guitar.
m: agreed, like i said most musical numbers tanked and that one rose to the occasion - Soprano?
b: And his breath probably stinks. every time I see him share the mic with Bruce, or in that case Dave, that’s all I can think about.
m: Ah…Steve Van Zant…
b: Yes, him. Ugh.
m: Yeah, creepy.
b: And with the fucking babooshka…
m: I thought of his breath when he was singing with Bruce’s wife. I don’t imagine Elvis Costello has gorgeous breath either.
b: He really creeps me out for some reason, and who cares about Elvis’s breath? It’s Elvis Fucking Costello.
m: Steve Van Zant seems like the obnoxious guy in the house - like he’d be a nightmare at a party.
b: TOTALLY!
m: Did you see that gay gay gay nelly number? MORT!
b: No.
m: It stank. So bad.
b: I saw the first hour and the Joe Strummer thing and that’s it.
m: The whole thing was a trip. Dustin Hoffman shoulda been axed, and that Dixie Chicks singer had eye make-up like she was going to Florentine Gardens with her West Covina homegirls as she sang some sweet, down-played hippy song - there were many moments of sheer perversity. The grammys kinda get suckier and suckier - their shite is all over the place, categorically speaking.
b: It blows.
